AMD Radeon HD 6770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6770 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 8.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 96
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 31% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1250 vs 462
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 313 vs 175
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2485
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2011 vs 1 November 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1250 vs 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 vs 175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2485 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 108 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1250 | 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 | 175 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3459 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.69 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2485 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6770 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Juniper | G92 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2011 | 1 November 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1139 | 1141 |
| Price now | $76.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 754 million |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6770 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6770 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 SE
AMDRadeon HD 6770 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTX
AMDRadeon HD 6770 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon HD 6770 vs
AMDRadeon E6760
AMDRadeon HD 6770 vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
AMDRadeon HD 6770 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
