AMD Radeon HD 6770M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6770M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 602 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 51% better floating-point performance: 696.0 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 73

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 982 vs 964
• Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 8338

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	964 982
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	572 73
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8338 15302
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3358

Compare specifications (specs)