AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 M275

AMD Radeon HD 6770M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
2.1x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1115 vs 964
Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 8338
5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 4.817
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.463 vs 234.842
5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 0.393
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 15.475
3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 33.71

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 January 2014 vs 4 January 2011
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 725 MHz
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 480
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115 vs 964
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231 vs 8338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064 vs 4.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.463 vs 234.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206 vs 0.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381 vs 15.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685 vs 33.71

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M

Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 569
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 1162
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1717
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 1162
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1717

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	572 vs 569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3044 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3348 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3044 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3348 vs 1717

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1115

964

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

572

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9231

8338

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.064

4.817

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

313.463

234.842

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.206

0.393

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.381

15.475

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.685

33.71

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

3044

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

3348

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

3044

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

3348

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M275	AMD Radeon HD 6770M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115	964
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	572
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231	8338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064	4.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.463	234.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206	0.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381	15.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685	33.71
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1162	3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1717	3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1162	3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1717	3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M275	AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Venus	Whistler
Launch date	28 January 2014	4 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$799.99
Place in performance rating	983	985
Price now	$699.99
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	3.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	725 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops	696.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	640	480
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s	17.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	716 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		35 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0