AMD Radeon HD 7560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7560D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1990 vs 1683
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1990 vs 1683
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 165 vs 158
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 459 vs 383
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Pipelines | 256 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1990 vs 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1990 vs 1683 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 vs 158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 vs 383 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 vs 1423
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 614 vs 593
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 614 vs 593
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1162 vs 1076
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1162 vs 1076
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 vs 1423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 vs 1076 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1423 | 1571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 593 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 593 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1076 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1076 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1990 | 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1990 | 1683 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 | 158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 | 383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7560D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Trinity | GF108 |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1423 | 1554 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 96 |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |