AMD Radeon HD 7610M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7610M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 12.5x more pipelines: 400 vs 32
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 360.0 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 632 vs 160
- 9.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 52
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1731
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1731
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 10 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops vs 117.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 632 vs 160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 52 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 1731 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 11.81 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 2632
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 2632
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 11.81 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 2632 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 632 | 160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | 52 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5257 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2632 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2632 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 1731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Whistler | G96C |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 10 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 672 | 674 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | 117.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 16.13 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1008 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7610M with others
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
