AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7750 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 96
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 462
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 175
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 vs 2485
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 vs 2485
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 February 2012 vs 1 November 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 462 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 425 vs 175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 vs 2485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 vs 2485 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | 462 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 425 | 175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | 2485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | 2485 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Cape Verde | G92 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch date | 15 February 2012 | 1 November 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 1142 | 1145 |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 96 |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 754 million |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |