AMD Radeon HD 7870M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7870M and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 556 vs 362
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 April 2012 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 556 vs 362 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3176 vs 1507
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 1367
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 1367
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3359
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 vs 1507 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7870M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7870M | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1507 | 3176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 556 | 362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1367 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1367 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 9064 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7870M | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Heathrow | GF100 |
Launch date | 24 April 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 575 | 576 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |