NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 vs 1230.769
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 September 2013 vs 7 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 vs 1230.769 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1344
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.802 vs 41.336
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 58.14
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 156.419
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.802 vs 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 vs 58.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 vs 156.419 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5328 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14380 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | 67.802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | 1230.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | 81.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 | 370.179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 27 September 2013 | 7 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 575 | 577 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |