AMD Radeon HD 8250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8250 and NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 16x more pipelines: 128 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 63 vs 55
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 217 vs 111
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1343 vs 882
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1343 vs 882
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 3 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 63 vs 55 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 217 vs 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1343 vs 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1343 vs 882 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1075 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 63 | 55 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 217 | 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 628 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 628 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1343 | 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1343 | 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8250 | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | Tesla |
Code name | Temash | G98 |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1620 | 1623 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 8 |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 31 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |