AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3275
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3275
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 September 2013 vs 30 May 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 15.3x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
- 11.5x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2010 vs 261
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 75
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7240 vs 5751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 115.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2010 vs 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 75 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7240 vs 5751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 261 | 2010 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 | 289 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5751 | 7240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.935 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Kalindi | GK106 |
| Launch date | 18 September 2013 | 30 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1031 | 1033 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 115.2 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 3.6 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,178 million | 2,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 863 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP with others
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3000M
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP vs
AMDRadeon HD 8730 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP vs
AMDRadeon E8860
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
