NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 9.4x more texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- 7.1x better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1753 vs 261
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 367 vs 75
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 18 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 115.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1753 vs 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 vs 75 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5751 vs 4487
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3332
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5751 vs 4487 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1753 | 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 75 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4487 | 5751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | Kalindi |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 18 September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1030 | 1031 |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 115.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 3.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,178 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8730 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon E8860
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
