AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 16x more pipelines: 128 vs 8
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 265 vs 111
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 68 vs 55
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 980 vs 882
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 980 vs 882
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2013 vs 3 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 vs 111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 vs 55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 980 vs 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 980 vs 882 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 497 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.976 GTexel / s
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 497 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.976 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 | 111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 55 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1126 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 619 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 619 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 980 | 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 980 | 882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Kalindi | G98 |
Launch date | 13 August 2013 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1620 | 1622 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 497 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 3.976 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 13 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 210 million |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Gigaflops | 31 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |