AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs Intel HD Graphics 510
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and Intel HD Graphics 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 533333.3x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 11.4 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1386 vs 1333
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1386 vs 1333
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 1786
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 1786
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 11.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 vs 1786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 1786 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 151
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 621 vs 316
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2381 vs 737
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 902 vs 359
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 359
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs July 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 vs 151 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 621 vs 316 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2381 vs 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 vs 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 vs 359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 510
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 162 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 316 | 621 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 737 | 2381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | 1786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 | 1786 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | Intel HD Graphics 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Scrapper Lite | Skylake GT1 |
Launch date | July 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1379 | 1509 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 12 |
Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | 11.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 8 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |