AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- Around 93% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 939 vs 681
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 284 vs 225
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5799 vs 2473
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.771 vs 6.498
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 vs 140.06
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 vs 0.502
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 vs 9.613
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 12.49
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1759 vs 1151
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2540 vs 1853
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2073
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1759 vs 1151
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 vs 1853
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2073
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 311.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 vs 681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 vs 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5799 vs 2473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 vs 6.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 vs 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 vs 0.502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 vs 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 vs 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 vs 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 vs 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 vs 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 vs 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2073 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 730 MHz
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 | 681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5799 | 2473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 | 6.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 | 0.502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 | 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 | 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 | 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2073 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Oland | GF108 |
| Launch date | 8 January 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1142 | 1440 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
| Price now | $99.21 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |