AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 18.72 GTexel / s versus 12.96 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- Environ 93% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 599.0 gflops versus 311.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 939 versus 681
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 284 versus 225
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5799 versus 2473
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.771 versus 6.498
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 versus 140.06
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 versus 0.502
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 versus 9.613
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 versus 12.49
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1759 versus 1151
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2540 versus 1853
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 2073
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1759 versus 1151
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 versus 1853
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 2073
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 versus 15 May 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s versus 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops versus 311.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 versus 681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 versus 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5799 versus 2473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 versus 6.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 versus 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 versus 0.502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 versus 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 versus 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 2073 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 730 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 | 681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5799 | 2473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 | 6.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 | 0.502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 | 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 | 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 | 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2073 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Oland | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 8 January 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1142 | 1440 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $99.21 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR3 | DDR3 |