AMD Radeon HD 8570D vs AMD FirePro V3900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570D and AMD FirePro V3900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 844 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1924 vs 1631
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1924 vs 1631
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 7 February 2012 |
Core clock speed | 844 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1924 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1924 vs 1631 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 480 vs 256
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 640 vs 437
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 vs 160
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1564 vs 1497
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1311 vs 843
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2966
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1311 vs 843
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2966
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 vs 437 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 vs 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 vs 1497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2966 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570D
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V3900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8570D | AMD FirePro V3900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 437 | 640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 236 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1497 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 843 | 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1924 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2966 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 843 | 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1924 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2966 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 58.58 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8570D | AMD FirePro V3900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Richland | Turks |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 7 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1332 | 1335 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 844 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 199 Watt | |
Transistor count | 716 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Half Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |