AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670M and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 24.8x better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 520 vs 85
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 242
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2270 vs 778
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2270 vs 778
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 1 February 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 vs 85 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 vs 778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 vs 778 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 775 MHz
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 85 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Mars | G86 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 1 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1173 | 1175 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 210 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |