AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs ATI Radeon HD 4850

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and ATI Radeon HD 4850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1986 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1022 vs 941
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 vs 75

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 620 MHz
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
• Around 68% better floating-point performance: 1,000.0 gflops vs 595.2 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1022 941
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	200 75
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3344

Compare specifications (specs)