AMD Radeon HD 8790M vs AMD FirePro V7900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8790M and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 326
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.576 vs 1.309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 vs 1.309 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 58.0 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2248 vs 1306
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 4752
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.134 vs 12.759
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 676.409 vs 465.631
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.678 vs 28.839
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 80.418
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2996 vs 2181
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2656
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2014
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2996 vs 2181
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2656
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2014
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 58.0 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,856.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2248 vs 1306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 vs 4752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.134 vs 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 676.409 vs 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.678 vs 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 vs 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2996 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2996 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2014 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | AMD FirePro V7900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | 2248 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4752 | 27733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.759 | 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.631 | 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 | 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.839 | 36.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 80.418 | 171.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2181 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2014 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2181 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2014 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8790M | AMD FirePro V7900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Mars | Cayman |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 24 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 846 | 848 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,856.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 58.0 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,640 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |