AMD Radeon HD 8970M vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8970M and NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 30.6x more texture fill rate: 72 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s
- 160x more pipelines: 1280 vs 8
- 102.7x better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 22.432 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 6x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 30.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3876 vs 126
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2013 vs 26 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops vs 22.432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3876 vs 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8970M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8970M | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3876 | 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 309 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1223.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.78 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.306 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.643 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2521 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2521 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2595 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8970M | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Neptune | GT218 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 14 May 2013 | 26 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 553 | 555 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 589 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 22.432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s | 2.356 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |