AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU versus NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 82% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 91% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1500 MHz versus 784 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 versus 4327
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 23955 versus 12186
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 versus 33.016
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 versus 736.063
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 versus 2.73
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 versus 31.588
- 8.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 versus 70.194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 22 July 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz versus 784 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 versus 4327 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23955 versus 12186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 versus 33.016 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 versus 736.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 versus 2.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 versus 31.588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 versus 70.194 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 108 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 3.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 1704 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 503 versus 371
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 versus 1715
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 versus 1177
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 versus 1724
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 versus 1715
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 versus 1177
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 versus 1724
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 1704 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 versus 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 versus 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 versus 1177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 versus 1724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 versus 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 versus 1177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 versus 1724 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 4327 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 503 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23955 | 12186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | 33.016 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | 736.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | 2.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | 31.588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | 70.194 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | 6373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | 6373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3311 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 700 | 702 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $446.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz | 784 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,107 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1344 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 87.81 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1704 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 172.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU avec des autres
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5200
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
AMDFirePro D300
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
