AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs AMD FirePro D700
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and AMD FirePro D700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 108.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 3,482 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6958 vs 6051
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6958 vs 6051
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67679 vs 25284
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 3,482 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 vs 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 vs 6051 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67679 vs 25284 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 274 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1634
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1634
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1846
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1846
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 1846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 1846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | AMD FirePro D700 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | 3348 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67679 | 25284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | AMD FirePro D700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 588 | 591 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | 263.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 5480 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 with others
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
AMDFirePro D700
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAT1000
