AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 875 MHz
  • 5.6x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
  • 4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1850 vs 277
  • Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 202
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 June 2017 vs 21 December 2013
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 875 MHz
Texture fill rate 39.01 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 160
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1850 vs 277
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 vs 202

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

  • 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
277
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
202
Name AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 1850 277
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 202
Geekbench - OpenCL 10245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Lexa Caicos
Launch date 12 June 2017 21 December 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Place in performance rating 820 822
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1219 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 875 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops 280.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 160
Texture fill rate 39.01 GTexel / s 7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt
Transistor count 2,200 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 56 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3