AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 736.185
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 40.08
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3325
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3325
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 7 December 2010 |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1280 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 vs 736.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 vs 40.08 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,405.4 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3928 vs 2576
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 431
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13327 vs 10581
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.849 vs 29.959
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 vs 2.893
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.953 vs 122.245
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4862 vs 4551
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 3607
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4862 vs 4551
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 3607
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops vs 1,248 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3928 vs 2576 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 vs 431 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13327 vs 10581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 vs 29.959 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 vs 2.893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 vs 122.245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 vs 3607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 vs 3607 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2576 | 3928 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 | 474 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10581 | 13327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | 36.849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | 736.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | 4.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | 40.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | 122.953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | 4862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 3668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | 4862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 3668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | GF110 |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 7 December 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 724 | 727 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1464 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 with others
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 400
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 PRO
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
