AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1201 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 28.659
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 26 November 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1201 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 vs 28.659 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 29.959
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 890.785 vs 864.134
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 1,248 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 29.959 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 vs 864.134 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2515 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | 76.687 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | 890.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | 28.659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | GM206 |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 26 November 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 721 | 961 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1201 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 2,460 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 112.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 with others
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 400
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 XT
