AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1018 MHz
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 500 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12285 vs 8681
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2017 vs 29 April 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1018 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12285 vs 8681 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 4096
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 731
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 4096 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 vs 731 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 295X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12285 | 8681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 731 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66605 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Vesuvius |
Launch date | 10 July 2017 | 29 April 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 202 | 203 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Price now | $1,099.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.14 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1018 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 2x 5,733 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2x 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 500 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 5632 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 307 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 640 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |