AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 731 vs 725
Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66605 vs 63932
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 1916.09
5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 31.471
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 545.751

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 July 2017 vs 1 October 2016
Pipelines	4096 vs 3840
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	230 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	731 vs 725
Geekbench - OpenCL	66605 vs 63932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3924.968 vs 1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	175.219 vs 31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1226.861 vs 545.751

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
Around 3% better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 12,288 gflops
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
4.8x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 12285
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 194.277 vs 174.714
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 vs 17.305
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 13848
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3680
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3336
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 13848
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3680
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3336

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1506 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Texture fill rate	394.8 GTexel / s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	12,634 gflops vs 12,288 gflops
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 16 GB
Memory clock speed	9016 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	15451 vs 12285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	194.277 vs 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	17.951 vs 17.305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20035 vs 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20035 vs 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12285

15451

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

731

725

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

66605

63932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

174.714

194.277

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3924.968

1916.09

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

17.305

17.951

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

175.219

31.471

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1226.861

545.751

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13848

20035

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3680

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13848

20035

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3680

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3356

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100	NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	12285	15451
PassMark - G2D Mark	731	725
Geekbench - OpenCL	66605	63932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	174.714	194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3924.968	1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	17.305	17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	175.219	31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1226.861	545.751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13848	20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3680	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13848	20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3680	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		8770

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100	NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Pascal
Code name	Vega 10	GP102
Launch date	10 July 2017	1 October 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,599	$5,999
Place in performance rating	202	204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Price now		$4,403.52
Value for money (0-100)		3.90
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1645 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1506 MHz
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops	12,634 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Pipelines	4096	3840
Texture fill rate	384.0 GTexel / s	394.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	230 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	12,500 million	11,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync II
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1 x 8-pin
SLI options		1
Width		2" (5.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz	9016 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	384 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management