AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 731 vs 724
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66605 vs 64134
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 1916.09
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 31.471
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 545.751

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
• Around 3% better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 12,288 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
• 4.8x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15387 vs 12285
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 194.277 vs 174.714
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 vs 17.305
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3336
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12285 15387
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	731 724
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	66605 64134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.714 194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3924.968 1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.305 17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	175.219 31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1226.861 545.751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3356

Compare specifications (specs)