AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 188 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 2220
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 409
• 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9016 vs 1853
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.707 vs 18.789
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.409 vs 1.775

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 1600 vs 640
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 vs 568.609
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.496 vs 39.784
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 vs 126.562
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 3347
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3671 vs 1749
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 3347
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3671 vs 1749

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2723 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 409
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9016 1853
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.707 18.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	568.609 1339.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.409 1.775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.784 43.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	126.562 245.813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 4541
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 4541
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3349

Compare specifications (specs)