AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 460 and AMD Radeon R7 M270DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 962
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 233
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 11 June 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 vs 962 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 vs 233 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 940 MHz vs 907 MHz
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz vs 907 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 460
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | AMD Radeon R7 M270DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 | 962 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15309 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 594.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 460 | AMD Radeon R7 M270DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Topaz |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 635 | 637 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 907 MHz | 940 MHz |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |