AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 516x more texture fill rate: 132.0 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 180 Watt
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55424 vs 38647
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 621
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 7125
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 vs 38647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 621 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 7125 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38647 | 55424 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 621 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7125 | 14696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP104 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 209 | 250 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |