AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 380

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

AMD Radeon R9 380

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 970 MHz
920.8x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 190 Watt
12.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 970 MHz
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 7635
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 7635

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 970 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 190 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 970 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730 vs 7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730 vs 7635

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380

Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 29361
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3595
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3595
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 vs 587
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6081 vs 5929

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1792 vs 1280
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	76397 vs 29361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3350
PassMark - G2D Mark	653 vs 587
PassMark - G3D Mark	6081 vs 5929

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29361

76397

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

7635

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

7635

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3359

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

587

653

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5929

6081

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 380
Geekbench - OpenCL	29361	76397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3359
PassMark - G2D Mark	587	653
PassMark - G3D Mark	5929	6081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		58.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1503.633
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2791

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 380
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Navi 14	Antigua
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	369	370
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Price now		$264.99
Value for money (0-100)		31.71
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	970 MHz
Compute units	20	28
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	1792
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	108.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	190 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	5,000 million
Floating-point performance		3,476 gflops
Stream Processors		1792
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot
Length		221 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	182.4 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	970 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore