AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

AMD Radeon R9 280X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
781.3x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB

Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X

Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 7730
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 7730
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3595
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3595
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 686 vs 617
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6211 vs 5996

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 1280
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9603 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9603 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3700 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3700 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3350
PassMark - G2D Mark	686 vs 617
PassMark - G3D Mark	6211 vs 5996

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

9603

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

9603

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3357

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

617

686

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5996

6211

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 280X
Geekbench - OpenCL	29450
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3357
PassMark - G2D Mark	617	686
PassMark - G3D Mark	5996	6211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		89.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1434.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		87.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		493.57
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2346

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 280X
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Navi 14	Tahiti
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	8 October 2013
Place in performance rating	354	378
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$299
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1000 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2048
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	128.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	4,313 million
Floating-point performance		4,096 gflops
Stream Processors		2048
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	288 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)