AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 1055.7x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29481 vs 22484
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 7730
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 7730
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3595
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3595
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 vs 615
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6930 vs 5995

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	29481 22484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7730 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7730 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3595 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3595 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3316
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	615 642
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5995 6930

Compare specifications (specs)