AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 834 MHz
  • 1336x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5460 MHz
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6763 vs 4916
  • Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37259 vs 23551
  • Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 vs 56.272
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 778.867
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 5.051
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 65.535
  • Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 336.811
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 834 MHz
Texture fill rate 124.8 GTexel/s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 5460 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6763 vs 4916
Geekbench - OpenCL 37259 vs 23551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.82 vs 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1860.146 vs 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.238 vs 5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.947 vs 65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 596.819 vs 336.811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

  • Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 654
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1792 vs 1536
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 715 vs 654

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6763
4916
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
654
715
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
37259
23551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
105.82
56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1860.146
778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.238
5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
94.947
65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
596.819
336.811
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5500M AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark 6763 4916
PassMark - G2D Mark 654 715
Geekbench - OpenCL 37259 23551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.82 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1860.146 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.238 5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.947 65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 596.819 336.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3426

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Navi 14 Grenada
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 351 448
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Compute units 24
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 834 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.994 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1536 1792
Pixel fill rate 41.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 124.8 GTexel/s 93.41 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 2,989 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 174.7 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 5460 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore