AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 1054.1x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 663 vs 408
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36824 vs 30239
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1681.162
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 8.754
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 416.14
• Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3426 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 85 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7900 vs 6775
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 vs 105.82
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 vs 94.947
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 9175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3670
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 9175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3670

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6775 7900
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	663 408
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36824 30239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.82 147.271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860.146 1681.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.238 8.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.947 98.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	596.819 416.14
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 12767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 12767
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 3316

Compare specifications (specs)