AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 555

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
4.3x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 200 MHz
3.9x more texture fill rate: 40.8 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
19.2x more pipelines: 768 vs 40
12.6x better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 1191
Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 399
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11389 vs 5081
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4042 vs 2095
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4042 vs 2095

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	40.8 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 40
Floating-point performance	1,306 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3141 vs 1191
PassMark - G2D Mark	659 vs 399
Geekbench - OpenCL	11389 vs 5081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4042 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4042 vs 2095

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 2221
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 2221

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3285 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3285 vs 2221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3141

1191

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

659

399

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11389

5081

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3285

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 555	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark	3141	1191
PassMark - G2D Mark	659	399
Geekbench - OpenCL	11389	5081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.301
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	572.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.706
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4042	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2221	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4042	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2221	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 555	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Polaris 21	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	5 June 2017	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	712	644
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,306 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	768	40
Texture fill rate	40.8 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	392 million
Boost clock speed		1300 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	eDRAM
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
Quick Sync