AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 40.8 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 61% better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 1020x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 1749
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 368
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11524 vs 4493
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.301 vs 12.582
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 572.795 vs 364.463
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.83 vs 1.254
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.388 vs 18.386
• 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 23.499
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4042 vs 2663
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3332
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4042 vs 2663
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3332

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 2221
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 2221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3141 1749
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	659 368
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11524 4493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.301 12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	572.795 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.83 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.388 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.706 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3332

Compare specifications (specs)