AMD Radeon Pro 555 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 versus 278
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 versus 81.753
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 versus 278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 versus 81.753 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 850 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.3 GTexel / s versus 40.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 768
- Environ 99% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,599 gflops versus 1,306 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3480 versus 3141
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12737 versus 11464
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 versus 31.301
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 versus 572.795
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.038 versus 2.83
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 versus 26.388
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6350 versus 4042
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 2221
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6350 versus 4042
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 2221
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s versus 40.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops versus 1,306 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3480 versus 3141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12737 versus 11464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 versus 31.301 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 versus 572.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 versus 2.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 versus 26.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 versus 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 versus 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 3480 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 278 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11464 | 12737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | 34.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | 960.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | 3.038 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | 59.57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | 81.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | 6350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | 6350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 555 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 716 | 718 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,306 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.8 GTexel / s | 108.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.6 GB / s | 120.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 555 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6700 XL
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
ATIRadeon X1050
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
ATIRadeon X550 XTX
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M
AMDRadeon Pro 555 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
