AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 3183
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 521
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 3.673
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 3845
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 3845
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 3183 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 vs 3.673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 vs 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 vs 3845 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 vs 41.388
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 804.436 vs 614.695
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 vs 31.274
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 vs 189.085
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3485 vs 2280
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3485 vs 2280
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,858 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 vs 41.388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 vs 614.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 vs 31.274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 vs 189.085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 vs 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 vs 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3183 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15826 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 43.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 804.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 3.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 64.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 221.539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 624 | 639 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Price now | $239 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 896 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,080 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 560 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
