AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs ATI Radeon E2400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 51% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 24.2x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
  • 25.6x more pipelines: 1024 vs 40
  • 38.7x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 48 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
  • 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • 66.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 52
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 287
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed 907 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 58.05 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1024 vs 40
Floating-point performance 1,858 gflops vs 48 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3475 vs 52
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 vs 287

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400

  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3475
52
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
724
287
Name AMD Radeon Pro 560 ATI Radeon E2400
PassMark - G3D Mark 3475 52
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 287
Geekbench - OpenCL 15445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 560 ATI Radeon E2400

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 TeraScale
Code name Polaris 21 RV610
Launch date 18 April 2017 28 June 2007
Place in performance rating 611 609
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 907 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,858 gflops 48 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 1024 40
Texture fill rate 58.05 GTexel / s 2.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-II
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 81.28 GB / s 11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz 1400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0