AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon R9 M270X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon R9 M270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 1204
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 21 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 306 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2280
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2280
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 306 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15445 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Venus |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 21 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 611 | 612 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 560 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIRadeon E2400
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIRadeon 2100 IGP
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M270X
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAT600 Mobile
