AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs Intel HD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
• 4.2x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 1114
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 268
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15445 vs 4554
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 27.948
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 614.695 vs 312.246
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 1.795
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.274 vs 20.404
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 vs 32.567
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 1859
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 vs 1945
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 1859
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 vs 1945

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3475 1114
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 268
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15445 4554
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.388 27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	614.695 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.837 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.274 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.085 32.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3344

Compare specifications (specs)