AMD Radeon Pro 560 versus Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Intel HD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 907 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 58.05 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- 42.7x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 24
- 4.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,858 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 versus 1114
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 268
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15445 versus 4554
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 versus 27.948
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 614.695 versus 312.246
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 versus 1.795
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.274 versus 20.404
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 versus 32.567
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 versus 1859
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 versus 1945
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 versus 1859
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 versus 1945
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 30 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 versus 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15445 versus 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 versus 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 versus 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 versus 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 versus 20.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 versus 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3344 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 4 GB
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 4 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15445 | 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 1.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 20.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 611 | 1216 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 24 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 189 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 560 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIRadeon E2400
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIRadeon 2100 IGP
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M270X
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAT600 Mobile
