AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 3138
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 516
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 38.068
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 3.386
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 18 June 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 3138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 vs 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 vs 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 vs 188.858 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 vs 15566
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 614.695
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 vs 31.274
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 4695
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 2280
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 4695
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 2280
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 vs 15566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 vs 614.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 vs 31.274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 vs 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 2280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 vs 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 2280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15566 | 16200 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 819.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Tobago |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 625 | 627 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $146.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 165 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |