AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 364
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 8622

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 Jun 2020 vs 23 April 2019
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2560 vs 1536
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 60 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	687 vs 364
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313 vs 8622

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 48379
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 10296
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 10296

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1140 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	53834 vs 48379
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12301 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12301 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

48379

53834

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

12301

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

12301

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3358

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

687

364

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8622

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL	48379	53834
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296	12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296	12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3358
PassMark - G2D Mark	687	364
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313	8622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		492.867
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4912

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 12	TU116
Launch date	15 Jun 2020	23 April 2019
Place in performance rating	271	333
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1335 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1140 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)	128.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)	8.202 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.274 TFLOPS	4.101 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	1536
Pixel fill rate	65.92 GPixel/s	64.08 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s	128.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count		6600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	192 bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6