AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 941 MHz
  • Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 967 MHz
  • 1521.7x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 108.3 GTexel / s
  • Around 90% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1344
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
  • 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47784 vs 12758
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 6350
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 6350
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 678 vs 279
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9198 vs 3496
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 vs 12 March 2014
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 941 MHz
Boost clock speed 1030 MHz vs 967 MHz
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s vs 108.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2560 vs 1344
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 47784 vs 12758
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10296 vs 6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10296 vs 6350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3353
PassMark - G2D Mark 678 vs 279
PassMark - G3D Mark 9198 vs 3496

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3715

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
47784
12758
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3353
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
678
279
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9198
3496
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Geekbench - OpenCL 47784 12758
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10296 6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10296 6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3353
PassMark - G2D Mark 678 279
PassMark - G3D Mark 9198 3496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 34.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 960.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 59.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 81.753
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1336

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Kepler
Code name Navi 12 GK104
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 12 March 2014
Place in performance rating 282 691
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz 967 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 941 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 1344
Pixel fill rate 65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s 108.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt
CUDA cores 1344
Floating-point performance 2,599 gflops
Transistor count 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.0 1.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 394.2 GB/s 120.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA