AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
858.3x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
110x more memory clock speed: 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48365 vs 40246
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 9834
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 9834

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 Jun 2020 vs 17 March 2015
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	48365 vs 40246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 845 vs 687
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13053 vs 9313

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Pipelines	3072 vs 2560
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	845 vs 687
PassMark - G3D Mark	13053 vs 9313

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

48365

40246

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3343

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3343

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

687

845

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

13053

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Geekbench - OpenCL	48365	40246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3343
PassMark - G2D Mark	687	845
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313	13053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		518.554
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		5234

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 12	GM200
Launch date	15 Jun 2020	17 March 2015
Place in performance rating	271	314
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$1,999.99
Value for money (0-100)		7.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1075 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	3072
Pixel fill rate	65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s	192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	250 Watt
CUDA cores		3072
Floating-point performance		6,691 gflops
Transistor count		8,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin + 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		600 Watt
SLI options		4x
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Technologies
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost