AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 10 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52740 vs 14238
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 6889
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 6889
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3462
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3214
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3214
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 10 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52740 vs 14238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3214 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 4 Aug 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52740 | 14238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 12.1 |
Code name | Navi 10 | DG1 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 31 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 246 | 523 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 39.60 GPixel/s |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 79.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR4X |