AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 53834
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 12301
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 12301
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 vs 53834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 | 53834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8622 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4912 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 227 | 333 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 128.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.202 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
