AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1670.2x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 84 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 vs 8068
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 vs 8068
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 vs 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 vs 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3458
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3458
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 3458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 3458 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34273 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4889 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 611 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.545 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.339 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1771 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | Curacao |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 392 | 440 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $399 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 2,800 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 575X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
